What is an entity? It is a “form of doing business.” Most single owner businesses start out as a “sole proprietorship,” which involves only a separate schedule, Schedule C, Business Profit & Loss, as part of the owner’s personal income tax return. If there are two owners (husband and wife would normally be considered “one owner.) a different form of entity must be selected. In many instances, the owner of a sole proprietorship will wonder (or be urged by a lawyer or CPA) about whether he/she should select a different form of entity, such as a corporation or an LLC (limited liability company.)
An “entity” is, also, considered to be a “person” separate from the owner or owners of that entity.. Therefore, if it is other than a sole proprietorship, the type of entity needs to be made perfectly clear in all business dealings with customers, suppliers, government agencies, etc. that they KNOW they are dealing with a “person separate from the partners or officers of that entity.”
The only valid reason, in my opinion, for changing from a sole proprietorship to some other form of entity is to protect the family assets other than those assets used in the business. Unless there is a large net worth, or more than usual exposure to claims against the business, the extra accounting, tax reporting, and even taxes, rarely justify adopting a different form of entity. Contractors and manufacturing firms are among those types of businesses that very often should be separated from the personal tax return.
Other than a sole proprietorship, which is the right one? I tend to differ on this subject from most lawyers and CPAs.
Simple partnerships between two (or more) GENERAL partners are fine, but do require an expertly prepared partnership agreement that properly records how each partner will be compensated for time or investment as well as how profits/losses will be shared; and, how the partnership will be terminated. Many partnership agreements are deficient in these areas.
Limited partnerships, where one or more owner does not assume liabilities of the partnership beyond that person’s investment, require an $800 per year minimum fee to State of California. Very few of these (in my experience) are being formed now.
Limited Liability Companies have replaced partnerships in most instances. They, also, require a minimum $800 annual tax, and, also, require an additional fee based on SALES rather than PROFITS, which can be onerous to a business with a large amount of sales.
Assuming it is right to have a form other than sole proprietorship, I prefer a corporation.
All ordinary business type corporations are formed as “C” corporations. Then, if desired, can become “S” corporations by “electing to do so.”
Most practitioners are advising to form “S” corporations in which all profits and or losses are passed on to the shareholders, rather than by being taxed to the corporation. There is a minimum $800 per year tax by CA to the corporation,
Officers of a corporation are “employees” by law, and are normally paid salaries commensurate with what the corporation can afford to pay. In an “S” corporation, however, profits passed on to shareholder/officers “in excess of salary,” are not subject to Social Security taxes which amount to 15.2% of salaries. This has been abused to the point that IRS is auditing and assessing penalties against MANY “S” corporations.
I recommend that owners NOT elect “S” corporation status. A “C” corporation is a simpler form of entity. Profits in excess of salaries are taxed to the corporation. Losses can be carried forward to offset later profits. Personal tax returns can be prepared without waiting for information related to the “S” corp, and capital can be sheltered in the corporation at low tax rates (15% federal tax after CA tax of 8.8% on the first $50,000 of profit.) to be available for business expansion.
The “excuse” for not liking the “C” corp is that profits left in the business are taxed again on dissolution of the corporation. I have found this to be an illusion. Profits can be taken out in the form of salary in most instances. Taxes on dissolution have been extremely small during by 45 years of working with these entities.
This is necessarily a minimal coverage of this subject. If interested, please ask questions.




